home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / lang / c++-part2 / 13565 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  1006 b 
  1. Path: access4.digex.net!not-for-mail
  2. From: ell@access4.digex.net (Ell)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
  4. Subject: Re: C++ vs Delphi 2.0
  5. Date: 26 Mar 1996 04:16:14 GMT
  6. Organization: The Universe
  7. Message-ID: <4j7r2e$2ur@news4.digex.net>
  8. References: <825673272.2083@axiombc.demon.co.uk> <4hmop6$snh@cdshub.cdc.com> <4ims71$oh3@hawk.pix.za> <3152304b.5915048@news.newcastle.edu.au> <4j2u9o$s0n@nntp.interaccess.com>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: access4.digex.net
  10. X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
  11.  
  12. Thaddeus L. Olczyk (Polczyk@interaccess.com) wrote:
  13. :..
  14. : One of the major selling points of Delphi I hear from most Delphi
  15. : programmers is "isn't it great I can write this application with
  16. : virtually no code".
  17.  
  18. That should be the first inclination regardless of language, to "'write
  19. this application with virtually no code'".  Taking that to mean one can
  20. write the application primarily with previously written code.  There is 
  21. "less visible" code.  A great precept of the oo, and other modern CS
  22. paradigms.
  23.  
  24. Elliott
  25.